Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adrian Ionel's avatar

How about speed and quality of execution as a moat? Nvidia for example broke through in part because of their ability to design and ship new chips 2x faster than the competition. As a result, they were impossible to catch or keep up with in the price/performance/cost equation. This seems to be still true today - perhaps even more so.

Expand full comment
Travis Holcombe's avatar

This includes some really strong critical considerations of this current dynamic. Perhaps this is ignorantly optimistic of me as someone in software, I agree with the idea that complex code will cease to offer the depth of moat it once did, but I am not so sure that software solving meaningful problems will truly become a commodity.

The professional services industry isn't a commodity, yet there is no technological moat to providing their managerial and consulting services. To your points, they rely on expertise, distribution, etc. to differentiate.

This isn't so much a comment for OnlyCFOs, but for the people that think breaking down the development barrier will kill the software industry. That might be true if the only thing propping up the industry was the barrier to entry of highly skilled technical expertise, but it isn't. Any meaningfully complex problem that a company solves with software requires a deep understanding, attention to detail, and consulting towards an outcome.

For many software companies, there unique ability to do that has always been the real moat.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts